Starr v. Ashbrook

Date Filed: Date not specified Case Number: G060597 Court: Cal. Ct. App. The court concluded the breach of fiduciary duty claim arose did not arise out of allegations of protected activity because, “the element of [the cross-complainant]’s claim for breach of fiduciary duty is the self-dealing act of diverting funds from the LLCs in which [the cross-defendant] owns an interest.” (Id. — This case addresses significant issues in California probate law. For the complete analysis, refer to the full opinion.