_index

# Case C098735 - Formatted Opinion --- Filed 8/13/25 *Garcia v. Garcia* CA3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED **California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.** IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Sacramento) ----

ALBERTO T. GARCIA,

Case No. A169131 - Formatted Opinion

Filed 8/13/25 Barrow v. Holmes CA1/1

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | SWEETWYNE P. BARROW, | > A169131 | | | > | | Plaintiff and Respondent, | > (Alameda County | | | > | | v\. | > Super. Ct. No. RG08412344) |

Case No. G063394 - Formatted Opinion

Filed 8/14/25 Clark v. Smith CA4/3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE LINDA CLARK, Individually and as Trustee, etc., Plaintiff and Appellant, IRA SMITH et al., Defendants and Respondents. (Super. Ct. No. 30-2018- 01021840) O P I N I O N Monteleone & McCrory, Patrick J. Duffy and Martha Eager for Plaintiff and Appellant. G063394 (Super. Ct. No. 30-2018-

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County, Erick L. Larsh, Judge. Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Conservatorship of the Person and Estate of Dong - …

Filed 8/15/25 Dong v. Chang CA1/3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

Conservatorship of the Person and Estate of Martha …

Filed 8/22/25 Conservatorship of the Person and Estate of Martha A. CA4/3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

Conservatorship of the Person and Estate of Rex …

Filed 8/25/25 Conservatorship of the Person and Estate of Martin CA2/2

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

Emeziem & Others v. Mark Unger - Formatted Opinion

Filed 8/27/25 Emeziem & Others v. Unger CA1/4

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR EMEZIEM & OTHERS, Plaintiff and Respondent, MARK UNGER et al., Defendants and Appellants. Super. Ct. No. C2302395) An attorney represented a group of trust beneficiaries in litigation seeking to remove the trustee, who was replaced pursuant to a settlement reached during a mediation. Following the mediation, the successor trustee arranged to distribute the trust assets to the beneficiaries, and the beneficiaries terminated their relationship with the attorney. The attorney took the position that a portion of the distribution should be made directly to him in payment of his fees under a contingency fee contract. When the distribution was made without paying anything under the contingency contract, the attorney sued the successor trustee, the successor trustee’s lawyer, and a law firm in which the lawyer for the successor trustee was a partner, seeking to collect the unpaid fees. The trial court sustained a demurrer without leave to amend, and this appeal followed. We affirm. A170497 Super. Ct. No. C2302395)

An attorney represented a group of trust beneficiaries in litigation seeking to remove the trustee, who was replaced pursuant to a settlement reached during a mediation. Following the mediation, the successor trustee arranged to distribute the trust assets to the beneficiaries, and the beneficiaries terminated their relationship with the attorney. The attorney took the position that a portion of the distribution should be made directly to him in payment of his fees under a contingency fee contract. When the distribution was made without paying anything under the contingency contract, the attorney sued the successor trustee, the successor trustee’s lawyer, and a law firm in which the lawyer for the successor trustee was a partner, seeking to collect the unpaid fees. The trial court sustained a demurrer without leave to amend, and this appeal followed. We affirm.

F088679 - Formatted Opinion

# Case F088679 - Formatted Opinion --- Filed 8/13/25 Conservatorship of R. J. CA5 **NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS** **California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.** IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

Conservatorship of the Person and Estate of R. J.

COLLEEN PHILLEY, as Conservator, etc.,

California Appellate Court Opinions

All Opinions (Alphabetical by Case Name)

A.F. v. Jeffrey F.

A151468

A154286

A155398

A155742

A157962

A158323

A158323M

A159532

A160473

A160985

A162222

A162671

A164821

A165163

A166830_20250827

A167001_20250820

A168185_20250822

A168634_20250827

A168697_20250827

A169131

A169131_20250813

A169131_20250814

A169527_20250822

A169579

A169579_20250815

A170012_20250825

A170297_20250821

A170497

A170497_20250827

A170526_20250820

A170812_20250822

A170942_test

A171063_20250827

A171241

A171257

A171257A

A171358_20250821

A172132_20250825

A172149_20250822

A172526_20250820

Algo-Heyres v. Oxnard Manor

Asaro v. Maniscalco

B123456

B234567

B281051

B281051M

B288054

B289603

B290526

B290805A

B292448

B292747

B293127

B293952

B294530

B295609

B295648

B295648M

B296011

B297092

B298119

B299238

B299856

B300017

B300021

B301382

B301382A

B303898

B305834

B306103

B306918

B306918M

B307242

B307338

B307559

B308440